You can not realistically ban encryption. Encryption is used to protect whatsapp number list communication through electronic devices; it protects your bank information and online accounts. This is cryptography, it is used in hundreds of systems. We have politicians speaking about banning whatsapp number list these technologies. How can this be? British Prime minister David Cameron has raised a red flag on encrypted messaging apps like whatsapp number list , and Snapchat. He has called for the banning of these whatsapp number list ; implying that they are being used by criminal organizations and terrorists to communicate.
"In our country, do we want to allow a means of communication whatsapp number list between people which we cannot read?", rhetorically said by the Prime Minister whatsapp number list With this sort of logic I am going to go as far as to say; we should leave our houses and cars unlocked; and valuables left unguarded in public spaces because surely it would be much simpler to catch thieves and put them whatsapp number list in prison.
Security is not just for what the social norm calls the "good guys". It is whatsapp number list a two way street. I would rather have peace of mind that my data is being protected so well; to the point that Government officials can not tap into it. Think about the various ways this could go whatsapp number list wrong. Imagine corrupt politicians with access to data or just consider that lightening up on security measures, will make it easier for the average hacker to gain access.
- Ten Forum Ten Forum
- All times are UTC
- Delete cookies
- Contact us